An email possibly made some sense:
It would probably be nice if some aspiring Clarence Darrow filed an Amicus Curiae brief reguarding the voracity of the suit. No federal agency had claimed infraction.
Enjoining Suddenlink from releasing information, based on a presumption of privacy might be helpful as well.
This is not an anti-Essent blog, it is to counter their current business model. That which values the individual staff member or patient less than the buck. Business sense is one thing, creating an atmosphere of Stalinist Russia is another. Do not log in on a PRMC computer, they are monitored. E-mail comments, questions, or criticisms. fac_p@hotmail.com!
7 comments:
I keep waiting to read in the paper or here, that some kind attorney has come to the defense of the Blog and the citizens of Paris...
No wrongs have been committed here on the blog...they take place at E$$ent'$ headquarters....
Keep grasping for straws Dick...noone here is scared of you or your bully boss
I keep waiting to read in the paper or here, that some kind attorney has come to the defense of the Blog and the citizens of Paris...
No wrongs have been committed here on the blog...they take place at E$$ent'$ headquarters....
Keep grasping for straws Dick...noone here is scared of you or your bully boss
Oh you want see any thing in defense of the blog in the Snooze. Just against it.
How about the ACLU? They are evil, but may want to defend your 1st amendment rights??
Paris has a paper it can be proud of....it recently won two awards I see.......Photography and ADVERTISING....imagine that...!!!
How can Frank fight this without giving up who he/she really is? If you hire a lawyer to stop all this ridiculous maneuvering do you have to put a true name on it or can you do it under an alias? This definitely feels like a way to get Frank to come out of hiding so they can fire him and get rid of the mole in the facility thus stopping the blog, or at least slowing the leaks. I am obviously not a lawyer and so would like to know. I am behind you all the way Frank.
I don't see how they can say it's an employee "leaking" this information. When people have been a patient in the hospital/ER they tell everybody about it. ANd then those people tell people. It's not HIPAA if the patient himself it blabbing his own info to the world. Hospital employees know better than to blab HIPAA info to anyone outside the hospital. I don't think it's employees Fletcher needs to be harassing.
Post a Comment